gangsterISM in football

I want to make it clear that I have been supporting Chelsea since 1997. Chelsea is not is G14 club, simple explanation on the club; the rich football club cartel. One of the team is Real Madrid. Real Madrid has been a bad boy and act of gangsterism is the practice within the club. Presidency elections means, POLITICS....Each of candidates seems to have an unwritten rule of naming player(s) he wants to sign IF he wins the election. I can't remember who was the president when they signed Figo from arch rival, Barcelona, but that was his promise to the club. They also signed Zidane after one of Real Madrid elections. Yes, I know Real Madrid can buy anyone they like, but to say it publicly is just a bad boy crying his heart out when he is denied a candy by his mother. Transfer dealing should be made in secret. Yes, I understand the media are 'thirsty' with hot news but my honest opinion each club should say something like this "this player is a great player, of course we would like him to play for our club, BUT he is still the player of x club" The buying club will only have permission to say more if the selling club allow them to talk to the players. The latest saga of Robben and Ballack made me really angry. They enjoyed 'immunity' from UEFA and FIFA and they have been doing this for years! If Chelsea would go about the same to Real Madrid players, they would cry as hard as a boy that JUST about to have public canning. Another act of gangsterism is anybody who hold ransom on Chelsea just because we have Roman. Shaun Wright Philips for 21 million? He just worth not more than half of the value paid by Chelsea. I am glad the big guns are being taken over by sugar daddies (soon it will be Arsenal) as they could not make any noise on how much money Chelsea has anymore. People may say Chelsea bought 120 million in a season, what I would say, those clubs hold ransom to Chelsea. They are 'mata duitan' not Chelsea. Who's the bad guy now? Chelsea or the club who TAKING ADVANTAGE? Also compare what have Manchester United has been spending since the start of EPL in 1992. Just compare in percentage how much others spend when Man Utd spend a 30 million pound for Rio alone!... then of course Chelsea do not have any good infrastructure and setup before Roman came in. Now we have our own training pitch for every level including under 10 to train in the same facility as the first team. It will take time for Chelsea fans to see the results, but I am sure they will come up with great English players in the next 5 years. For anyone who does not know the real history about EPL, let me tell you this... Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal and Everton were the clubs who proposed home gate receipt to be kept by the home side. Previously, the total gate receipt for the whole season was shared between 20 teams in the league. As the result of new rulings, Manchester United got the upper hand on others as their stadium can hold up to 60,000 spectators = meaning more money to home team. Now when Chelsea has Roman, people cry foul play. Get on with it... Keep the blue flag flying high!